05.24.07

Fall ‘07 Class Schedule

Posted in Education at 4:58 pm by eliana

Well, I’ve put together my fall schedule and registered for classes. Here it is:

CH812 Historiography
OL610 Intermediate Hebrew Grammar
OL943 Akkadian
OT581 History and Archaeology of the Ancient Near East
OT645 Exegesis in I & II Samuel

Exegesis in I & II Samuel is actually waitlisted right now, and I’m #4 (and somehow Calvin got ahead of me at #3!), so my backup plan is ET602 Human Sexuality to fulfill my Ethics elective requirement. It’s right before Akkadian - I thought maybe a paper on homoeroticism in the Epic of Gilgamesh would be appropriate??

3 out of 5 classes depend on me passing the Hebrew Proficiency exam. There really should be no reason why I wouldn’t pass it. I have 2 years of Hebrew under my belt, for goodness sake! Still, there is no Hebrew study guide up on the GCTS website though there is one for Greek and a brief “what to expect” for the OT and NT comp exams. I emailed the registration office and they passed me on to Dr. Pratico, but I haven’t heard anything back yet. If anything, I think it’ll be forgetting vocab that’ll kill me, so I’m going to have to study hard this summer to make sure I know down pat whatever words he wanted you to know in his Hebrew I & II textbook.

Needless to say, I’m pretty excited. I’m especially psyched about taking Akkadian. Right now, however, I have to put the dancing characters out of my mind and work on getting more than one box every five days packed. At this rate, we’ll be ready to move in about 3 years…

05.23.07

I’m an Aunt!

Posted in Personal at 8:43 pm by eliana

My familial relations have just expanded as we just received word that my sister-in-law (Calvin’s brother’s wife) just gave birth to her first child, and my first niece. Congratulations to the new parents. Boy do I feel old! (But not as old as the new grandparents, heh heh heh…)

05.22.07

Wine Trail

Posted in Personal at 8:50 pm by eliana

The Finger Lakes region is just bursting with wineries, and this past Sunday I went with my friend Florrie and her sister on part of the local wine trail, mostly on one lake though we shot over to another briefly near closing times.

Sadly, I forgot my new digital camera, but Florrie did take a few pictures which I hope to procure from her at some point. I am new to the wine scene myself, so this was a perfect opportunity to try many varieties (I estimate I must have tasted 40+!) and see what I like. The prices were fantastic buying straight from the wineries, and I came home with a full case (12 bottles) of my favorites - which will last us a good long time, and are a nice start to our wine collection. In case you are interested, here is an inventory of the wines I picked:

*Penguin Bay Tuxedo White from Penguin Bay Winery
*Goose Watch Golden Spumante Champagne from Penguin Bay Winery
*Banana Belt Blush from Atwater Estate Vineyards
*Strawberry White Zinfandel from Pleasant Valley Wine Company
*Blackberry Merlot from Pleasant Valley Wine Company
*Sweet Rosie from Americana Vineyards & Winery
*Cabin Fever from Hazlitt 1852 Vineyards
*White Cat from Hazlitt 1852 Vineyards
*Red Cat from Hazlitt 1852 Vineyards
*Niagara from Leidenfrost Vineyards (x2)
*Log Cabin Rose from Leidenfrost Vineyards

The last 2, alas, you can only buy straight from the winery, whereas the others you can get from local shops in this area and I think most you can order from their websites which I linked. My absolute favorite is the Strawberry White Zinfandel, followed closely by the Golden Spumante (the only sparkling wine I picked up). There was also a fantastic iced dessert wine that I tried from Atwater, but it was a little pricey and I couldn’t justify purchasing it on this occasion.

Anyways, for any wine connoisseurs out there, if you’re ever feeling brave and want to try something new, those are some recommendations from a wine novice!

05.20.07

The Wounded Healer by Henri J. M. Nouwen

Posted in Books, Evangelicalism™, Ministry at 10:11 am by eliana

This little book is short, inexpensive, but worth the read. Originally published in 1972, Nouwen was obviously writing in a slightly removed culture and to a different generation, but there were plenty of what I would deem timeless truths to be gleaned from the 100 pages of my 1979 edition.

If I rewrote the book today, I would probably use some different terminology and catch-phrases, but his emphasis on true compassion, authentic community, and especially ministering to people from our own woundedness are just as applicable today as they were in the 70’s. Growing up I know my husband as a PK often heard repeated this idea that ministers somehow needed to hide their pain from their congregations to be able to minister to them. This theory is still perpetuated today in Evangelicalism™. Nouwen blows this idea out of the water, and in fact states just the opposite.

Though I think he was aiming his book toward the audience of “the minister,” the principles will resonate with anyone seeking to “minister” to people.

05.14.07

Johns Hopkins University?

Posted in Education at 8:20 pm by eliana

Thanks to a tip from Q, I checked out Johns Hopkins University’s department of Near Eastern Studies.

It actually sounds quite interesting. A Ph.D in Hebrew Bible and Northwest Semitic Philology from Johns Hopkins? Who would have thought? I always kinda sterotyped them as the “medical” school.

05.12.07

Thoughts on Compassion

Posted in Books, Church, Ministry at 1:15 pm by eliana

A striking quote from The Wounded Healer by Henri J. M. Nouwen:

Through compassion it is possible to recognize that the craving for love that men feel resides also in our own hearts, that the cruelty that the world knows all too well is also rooted in our own impulses. Through compassion we also sense our hope for forgiveness in our friends’ eyes and our hatred in their bitter mouths. When they kill, we know that we could have done it; when they give life, we know that we can do the same. For a compassionate man nothing human is alien: no joy and no sorrow, no way of living and no way of dying.

What would happen if we had this mindset?

05.08.07

Debating Calvinism (James White, Dave Hunt)

Posted in Books, Theology and the Bible at 9:13 pm by eliana

I don’t know why I read this book. I wanted to pluck my eyeballs out by the time I had finished. I only forced myself to complete it because I started it. I guess I thought it would be helpful in my understanding of Calvinism, but if anything, it only made me remember why I despise systematic theology so much.

I digress. As my title suggests, the book I refer to is Debating Calvinism: Five Points, Two Views, which was basically a written debate between James White and Dave Hunt.

I could have blogged as I read the book, but I probably would have been too overly harsh on the authors - both of them - had I done this, so I waited until I was done, gave myself a few weeks to digest, calm down, and hopefully give a calm general overview of the book rather than give a point by point scathing review (er, other than my introduction of course).

The Problems with the Book

Problem #1: James White is an eloquent (Baptist variety) reformed systematic theologian to the T (get it, to the T? anyways…) and Dave Hunt isn’t an Armenian. I was hoping for a debate between a Calvinist and an Armenian so I could understand both systems better. Instead, mostly it was James White espousing his views, Dave Hunt attacking Calvinism in return, and then James White telling Dave Hunt how ignorant he was for not understanding/believing the Truth.

Problem #2: James White is theologically educated, Dave Hunt is not. This should be self-explanatory. I think Dave Hunt just has it in for Calvinism, which is why he wanted this debate. I think it is a sincere effort based on serious concerns he has, and I don’t want to demean him in any way.

Problem #3: This was really the major killer. Both James White and Dave Hunt acted like children throughout the entire book. Seriously. “You’re wrong.” “No, you’re wrong.” No, you’re wrong!” “Your momma!” “Oh yeah, well your momma…and your Bible verse too!” Okay, so maybe not in so many words, but quite honestly they were barely civil to each other. I just didn’t feel the love.

Problem #4: They talked past each other, and did exactly the same thing that the other said the other did. I.e, “You take your pet verse(s) and interpret the verses that don’t agree with the verse(s) you like best in light of your pet verse(s).” “No I don’t, you do.” And then they both do.

My Problem

Which leads me to my problem. I hate systematic theology. Because they both did that very same last thing. And then (James White especially, since he actually had a systematic theology) fill in the holes with principles drawn from the favorite verses, etc. etc. Proof-texting abounded on both sides. I despise proof-texting. Not that Dave Hunt was any better. Granted, I knew I was picking up a book that would use systematic theology, and thus would make me want to pluck my eyeballs out, I just think I had forgotten how much ST rankles my nerves. This is not a slam against either author personally, just a comment on systematic theology. Systematic theology, well, systematizes the Bible and theology.

Side Rant Having Nothing to Do with the Book Review

YOU CAN’T DO IT. Theology is fluid. It’s complex. It’s contradictory. That’s because God is complex, and sometimes seems a little contradictory. You can’t cage him. You can’t put walls around him. The instant you do, you’re bound to discover something that doesn’t fit into your neat little package. And so you’ll be forced to bend it, twist it, shove it, until you fit that square into the circle puzzle hole. And in doing so do great injustice to those very things you just wanted so desperately to understand. It is a sincere effort, but in our human limitations it just falls short.

Back on Track

On the upside, I did gain one item of interest from reading this book. I have been bluntly informed by James White that if I am not a Calvinist, I could not possibly believe in Penal Substitutionary Atonement, because this is a view of the atonement that goes hand-in-hand with the system of reformed theology. I in fact did not realize this before, but after reading his rational argument, I do see how this makes sense. I think this was meant to convince me to be a Calvinist, because most Christians believe in penal substitutionary atonement without even knowing it, “Calvinist” or not.

I, of course, refuse to submit so easily. Since I’m not a Calvinist, I guess I can’t believe in the penal substitutionary view of the atonement anymore. I’m currently exploring other options. Any thoughts?

05.06.07

When I Grow Up…

Posted in Education, Life Observations, Personal at 10:49 am by eliana

It seems like the eternal question that adults are always asking little children, from the time they can speak, until the time that it seems a little ridiculous to say “grow up” (and then it just morphs into another form): What do you want to be when you grow up?

I went through all the normal phases as a young girl. The earliest I remember was wanting to be a veterinarian. Then I realized somberly that if a poor sick cat was brought in that had to be put to sleep, I just could never do it. Then I wanted to be a marine biologist (title compliments of my mother, who defined the field for me). Then I thought I might have to do too much math and complex science and I wasn’t sure if I liked boats that much. So I changed to a zoo keeper. Wouldn’t it be cool to be able to actually work with tigers, after all? Then I realized I’d probably have to start at the bottom cleaning poop out of cages and work my way up to the really cool jobs of getting to work with the animals.

Then somewhere around 8th grade I changed my focus from animals and decided I was going to be an interior decorator. I don’t know where that one came from. I liked pretty things. I thought I could help people design pretty rooms for their houses. It was either that or I was going to be a counselor and help people feel better. This continued through 9th grade, then I realized that for both jobs, I really didn’t like people and they were difficult to work with. Most likely they wouldn’t take my advice in either venue and do what they wanted and make a wreck of things.

So then I think somewhere right before my 10th grade year I decided I was going to be a Christian singer. I was pretty resolute here. I could sing, surely I’d make it. That lasted all of a year. A fool’s dream. We moved again. For the first time in my life, I went to a public school, and I felt like my life was spinning out of control as I tried desperately to hang on to faith and hope that all would be okay. Somewhere during my tenure at “that place,” my heart softened and I decided I wanted to help teenagers. My collection of lunch table friends by the time I graduated consisted of the experimental Wiccan, the druggie, the liberal Methodist, the agnostic, and a few more to boot, and I loved them all dearly. Oddly enough, I never proselytized any of them - somehow I just got included in the group. I think I was just the token Christian at the lunch table. I don’t think I ever helped any of them, but I decided I was going to marry my then boyfriend Calvin, settle down and be a youth pastor’s wife.

So off I went to Bible college, naturally. Where suddenly my world was drastically, suddenly, yet not so suddenly, changed again. Everything I thought I knew about God and the Bible was turned upside down on its head, and who I am today is not the person I was when I began. And once again, my plans for life went haywire again. Who would have ever thought a casual, almost flippant (on my end) conversation at the end of my sophomore year, when it was time to register for classes, with Dr. Snyder could have changed my life so radically? I think it went something like this:
SNYDER: “You should really take Hebrew.”
ME: “Sure, okay.”
So I did. Casually, noncommittally, just because Dr. Snyder said I should (and had been for some time), and I respected his opinion.

I already had stirred in me from my first two years a great love for the Old Testament - so it seemed somewhat natural to take a little bit of Hebrew. But what I didn’t realize that somehow taking Hebrew would make me absolutely positively fall in love with the language, the Hebrew Bible, and anything to do with it. I knew I had to have more, or I’d never be at rest. I took another year, and it still wasn’t enough. Somewhere I realized that I was so heartbroken that regular people didn’t know Hebrew, and didn’t have an appreciation for the Hebrew Bible. Oddly enough, my desire to help teenagers didn’t really go away, and somehow I fought within myself over these two seeming conflicting things. Needless to say, I married my then boyfriend Calvin, but have no intention of settling down and being “just” a youth pastor’s wife (not that there’s anything wrong with that, of course.)

Now here I am, going for a M.A. Old Testament, and people are always asking me, “So what do you plan to do with your life?” (Another way of saying, what are you going to be when you grow up?) And I come up with some lame answer like I’m going to teach, because hopefully I will, because I have to make money, and because what else does one do? And certainly what else does one do once one gets a Ph.D, which I hope to do? How can I explain some sort of weird paradoxical desire I have to help the church - specifically teenagers - with ANE studies? And while doing this be a help to my husband? People look at me like I’m crazy. I am crazy.

Like a veterinarian, I see lots of things that I may have to do that I really don’t want to do. Like a marine biologist, I see difficult things to learn that I’m not really good at. Like a zoo keeper, I see working my way up through ugly, nasty work that isn’t really satisfying or where I want to be. Like a an interior decorator or counselor, I see working with people, who neither care about my ideas nor want to be helped. Like a singer, I feel like I’m reaching for some unattainable goal.

All of the hardships of my childhood career dreams are rolled into one big mass waiting to explode in my face. I have no idea what’s going to happen in my future. I like to pretend I have it all laid out, but I know I don’t. Somewhere along the line, it’s all going to go haywire. And somehow, my husband and I have to walk this track together while looking for a church to fit into and minister to teenagers, if that’s even how life leads us - “traditional ministry” context. I know he’s facing similar issues, but I’ll let him blog about that. I’m getting a M.A., I hope to get a Ph.D, and you know what?

I’m doing this because I am compelled by a passion that will not rest inside of me. But I have absolutely no idea what I’m going to be when I grow up. And sometimes, I’m just terrified.

05.05.07

My Theological Worldview

Posted in Personal, Theology and the Bible at 2:28 pm by eliana

Hey, so this was sort of fun, I stole the idea from Dr. Q who stole it from…etc. etc. What I find really interesting is how Charismatic/Pentecostal got so high up on the list….and right next to Reformed Evangelical! Well, I’ve always been a mutt.

You scored as Emergent/Postmodern. You are Emergent/Postmodern in your theology. You feel alienated from older forms of church, you don’t think they connect to modern culture very well. No one knows the whole truth about God, and we have much to learn from each other, and so learning takes place in dialogue. Evangelism should take place in relationships rather than through crusades and altar-calls. People are interested in spirituality and want to ask questions, so the church should help them to do this.

Emergent/Postmodern

82%

Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan

64%

Neo orthodox

61%

Charismatic/Pentecostal

46%

Reformed Evangelical

46%

Roman Catholic

36%

Classical Liberal

36%

Modern Liberal

32%

Fundamentalist

11%

What's your theological worldview?
created with QuizFarm.com